https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19359
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|2.26 |2.27
Summary|[2.26/2.27 regression] gas |gas fails with Error: junk
|fails with Error: junk at |at end of line: `8' on
|end of line: `8' on |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed mainline. As far as I can see, this isn't a binutils regression.
gcc bug opened here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
Peter, I haven't investigated why gcc is misbehaving and I'm supposed to be on
vacation. It is almost certainly an error in rs6000.h:ASM_CPU_SPEC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
