https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #37 from Hanno Boeck <hanno at hboeck dot de> --- Hi Nick, You'll be happy to hear that even with lots of fuzzing samples I wasn't able to create another address sanitizer error. But I'll keep trying. However I still experience some warnings that I think would deserver a fix. They allocate too much memory. One is triggered by the dllmaxvals.dll (attachment 7850). I think what is happening here is that libbfd is just allocating space for the executable segments with whatever values are given in the header. A check to verify if the executable is that large should stop this. The other is in the elf parser and I haven't analzed further. I'll attach the fuzzing sample exposing it and also the valgrind output (with non-asan binaries, because valgrind and asan don't mix well). Address Sanitizer doesn't give that much output for these, but valgrind does and this should give a clue what's going on. cu, Hanno -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
