http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15636
Bug ID: 15636
Summary: [2.24 regression] missing NEEDED libc when building
with g++ -Wl,--as-needed
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/712081]
Compiling a trivial int a() {return 17;} file with
g++ -v -Wl,--as-needed t.c --shared -o libt${n}.so
With binutils 2.23.52.20130612-1:
$ readelf -d /tmp/libt3.so | grep NEEDED
$ objdump -T libt3.so | grep _cxa_fin
0000000000000000 w D *UND* 0000000000000000 __cxa_finalize
While with binutils 2.22-8 and 2.23.2:
$ readelf -d libt2.so | grep NEEDED
0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6]
$ objdump -T libt2.so | grep _cxa_fin
0000000000000000 w DF *UND* 0000000000000000 GLIBC_2.2.5 __cxa_finalize
i.e. the dependency on libc.so.6 is missing and what is worse:
the libc6 symbol is not properly versioned, which might mean that that
library might cause programs segfault with future libc versions.
g++ says it does:
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared' '-o' 'libt3.so' '-shared-libgcc'
'-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/collect2 --sysroot=/ --build-id
--eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 --hash-style=gnu -shared -o libt3.so
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/crtbeginS.o
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../../lib
-L/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
-L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../..
--as-needed /tmp/cc8CjUQJ.o -lstdc++ -lm -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/crtendS.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/crtn.o
with the need for symbol __cxa_finalize coming from crtbeginS.o:
$ objdump -t /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/crtbeginS.o | grep _cxa_fi
0000000000000000 w *UND* 0000000000000000 __cxa_finalize
gcc unlike g++ is not affected because it puts a --no-as-needed before -lc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
