http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15545
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Tom,
> One idea would be to simply remove the calls to bfd_cache_init from
> opncls.c, but at the same time change gdb to add them.
I am not sure about this. I dislike the idea of changing the behaviour of an
exported library function. What if other tools are built against libbfd and
rely upon the current behaviour ?
In my opinion what should happen is that an uncacheable should not be able to
be reopened. So please could you try out the uploaded patch that implements
this idea and let me know what you think.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
