http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15345
Bug #: 15345
Summary: [2.23.2 regression] binutils-2.23.2 tarball doesn't
build without makeinfo
Product: binutils
Version: 2.23
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: admin
AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: mi...@it.uu.se
Classification: Unclassified
Building from unmodified release tarballs shouldn't require makeinfo, but with
binutils-2.23.2 a missing makeinfo causes a hard build error:
...
make chew
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/doc'
make[4]: `chew' is up to date.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/doc'
./chew -f /home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/doc.str
</home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/../linker.c >linker.tmp
/bin/sh /home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/../../move-if-change
linker.tmp linker.texi
restore=: && backupdir=".am$$" && \
rm -rf $backupdir && mkdir $backupdir && \
if (/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/missing makeinfo
--split-size=5000000 --split-size=5000000 --version) >/dev/null 2>&1; then \
for f in bfd.info bfd.info-[0-9] bfd.info-[0-9][0-9] bfd.i[0-9]
bfd.i[0-9][0-9]; do \
if test -f $f; then mv $f $backupdir; restore=mv; else :; fi; \
done; \
else :; fi && \
if /home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/missing makeinfo
--split-size=5000000 --split-size=5000000 -I
/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc \
-o bfd.info `test -f 'bfd.texinfo' || echo
'/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/'`bfd.texinfo; \
then \
rc=0; \
else \
rc=$?; \
$restore $backupdir/* `echo "./bfd.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; \
fi; \
rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc
WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if
you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file
indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious
call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX,
DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or
the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site.
make[3]: *** [bfd.info] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/doc'
Making info in po
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/po'
( if test 'x/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/po' != 'x.'; then \
posrcprefix='/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/'; \
else \
posrcprefix="../"; \
fi; \
rm -f SRC-POTFILES-t SRC-POTFILES \
&& (sed -e '/^#/d' \
-e '/^[ ]*$/d' \
-e "s@.*@ $posrcprefix& \\\\@" <
/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/po/SRC-POTFILES.in \
| sed -e '$s/\\$//') > SRC-POTFILES-t \
&& chmod a-w SRC-POTFILES-t \
&& mv SRC-POTFILES-t SRC-POTFILES )
( rm -f BLD-POTFILES-t BLD-POTFILES \
&& (sed -e '/^#/d' \
-e '/^[ ]*$/d' \
-e "s@.*@ ../& \\\\@" <
/home/mpettersson/binutils-2.23.2/bfd/po/BLD-POTFILES.in \
| sed -e '$s/\\$//') > BLD-POTFILES-t \
&& chmod a-w BLD-POTFILES-t \
&& mv BLD-POTFILES-t BLD-POTFILES )
cd .. \
&& CONFIG_FILES=po/Makefile.in:po/Make-in \
CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status
config.status: creating po/Makefile.in
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status: executing libtool commands
config.status: executing default-1 commands
config.status: executing bfd_stdint.h commands
config.status: executing default commands
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/po'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/po'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd/po'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd'
make[2]: *** [info-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2/bfd'
make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mpettersson/objdir-2.23.2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
binutils-2.23.1 builds fine on the same system (a very basic CentOS 6.4/x86_64)
with the same configuration options and build procedure. My guess is that some
files weren't properly regenerated before the release was tarred up.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
