http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200

--- Comment #16 from pete <petechou at gmail dot com> 2013-03-20 05:38:56 UTC 
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I think that is what my patch does.  Did I get it wrong?

I'm thinking the patch does the same thing as mine.

I have 2 questions:
1. in_reg() and in_dyn() seem to be mutual exclusive?
2. is it possible to see in_dyn() and is_from_dynobj() return different truth
values for a symbol?
Did I misunderstand something?

> 
> I think it probably makes sense in general to create an only_if_ref
> linker-defined symbol if there is a ref in the regular objects and a 
> definition
> in a shared object.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to