http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14006
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> 2012-05-02 16:15:24
UTC ---
Hi Wim,
> As far as I can tell the bug doesn't depend on what the first instruction is;
> it only affects the first instruction, not the rest of the function; and only
> with code compiled with -ffunction-sections. (Possibly only if the preceding
> function/section ended with a literal pool?
This is essentially correct. The code to scan the mapping symbols associated
with the functions being disassembled did not take into account the possibility
that new function sections would exist.
Please could you try out the uploaded patch which should fix the problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
