http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561
--- Comment #3 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:37:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > > > --- Comment #1 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:11:26 UTC --- > > sandbox@rs6k> nm -C partial.o > > > > 00000148 T .bar() > > 00000000 T .foo() > > 00000078 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*) > > 000000d8 W .std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr() > > U .operator delete(void*) > > U .operator new(unsigned long) > > 100002f0 d .data > > 100002a0 d .data > > 00000148 t .text > > 00000000 t .text > > 1000037c d TOC > > 100002f0 D _GLOBAL__F_bar.cpp_9A43FB88_F8600D79 > > 100002a0 D _GLOBAL__F_foo.cpp_9647360E_2B1D02D2 > > 10000358 D bar() > > 10000358 d bar() > > 10000334 d foo() > > 10000334 D foo() > > 10000340 W std::auto_ptr<int>::auto_ptr(int*) > > 1000034c W std::auto_ptr<int>::~auto_ptr() > > > > Mmmmh - I cannot relate the failing RLD address of 0x10000364 to the nm > > output > > … > > Addresses look weird for a partially linked object. > Did GNU 'ld -r' ever worked for AIX ? > > Tristan. Yes - partial linking normally works for me on AIX. But there are cases - like this one reported here - where it fails. In my impression this is related to virtual functions, especially virtual destructors in conjunction with templates. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
