http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2011-06-29 14:58:57
UTC ---
Thanks for the test case. The elflint program is getting confused when it
tries to find the .dynamic section. The PT_DYNAMIC segment is at address
0x32000. It happens that the .tbss section is at sddress 0x32000. Since the
.tbss section is SHT_NOBITS, it does not take up any address space. The
.dynamic section then follows it, also at address 0x32000. In the readelf -S
output:
[18] .tbss NOBITS 0000000000032000 00032000
0000000000000008 0000000000000000 WAT 0 0 4
[19] .dynamic DYNAMIC 0000000000032000 00032000
0000000000000240 0000000000000010 WA 3 0 8
This is confusing elflint. It is using gelf_offscn to return the section at
offset 0x32000. That winds up being the .tbss section, not the .dynamic
section. Based on that it decides that there are no DT_NEEDED entries, and
issues the .gnu.version_r warnings.
I don't see any gold problem here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
