http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn <davek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 16:21:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created attachment 5302 [details]
> Testcase #2
>
> (Is it ok to post here, or should I file another bug report for it?)
Can you check whether that works with GOLD? If GOLD also fails (though perhaps
in a different way - maybe a redefinition error for bar) then I think the first
thing would be to post this testcase to the binutils list and try and figure
out what is *supposed* to happen. That foo symbol is invisible to LTO, we
might just decide that it's not valid code. If you replace the asm by
void foo (void) __attribute__ ((alias("bar"))) ;
it all works fine, as we would hope.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
