http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12496
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-02-24 21:12:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > > I think it is the correct behavior since the LTO version of > > the function isn't used anyway. > > Do you mean it's a linker "feature" rather then a bug? That is, if GCC > generates a call to some function on the LTO stage, and this function is in an > object file which is in a static library, then care should be taken to *not* > create that object with -flto. If a file with IR isn't used during LTO stage, it shouldn't be used at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
