------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-06-19 13:56
-------
Hi Chris,
The first 'discrepancy' is deliberate. The immediate value in a shifted
operand can only be in the range 0 - 31 so there is no benefit in providing a
hexadecimal equivalent. When an immediate value is the entire operand however
it can have a much wider range and so it is helpful to display the hexadecimal
equivalent of the decimal number.
The second discrepancy is just that. Please could you try out the uploaded
patch which should fix the problem, giving the disassembler a consistent message
for undefined instructions.
Cheers
Nick
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10297
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
