------- Additional Comments From julian at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-17 14:52 ------- I have tried to reproduce this, but not managed so far. I attempted to build current binutils head with current GCC head under an ARM full-system (Debian) qemu instance, using:
binutils-build$ configure --prefix=/path/to/prefix binutils-build$ make; make install gcc-build$ configure --prefix=/path/to/prefix --enable-languages=c,c++ gcc-build$ make bootstrap where: $ uname -a Linux armel 2.6.24-1-versatile #1 Sat Feb 23 08:09:20 UTC 2008 armv5tejl GNU/Linux $ cat /etc/debian_version lenny/sid Which gcc, binutils versions and/or configure options did you use? In particular, were you building for ARM mode or Thumb mode? (My build broke with a pile of errors like the following: libbackend.a(insn-automata.o): In function `VEC_rtx_base_quick_insert': /home/jules/mainline/gcc-build/gcc/../../gcc-trunk/gcc/rtl.h:199: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `memmove@@GLIBC_2.4' defined in .plt section in /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.3.3/../../../crti.o so I guess I did something wrong somewhere.) Julian -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10259 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
