------- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-10 02:24 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You seem to be trying to say that section indexes between SHN_LORESERVE and > SHN_HIRESERVE are not to be used. However, there is no support for that in > the > ELF spec. And it is not required to make everything work.
I said quite opposite. See comment #1. Section index 0xfff2 is between SHN_LORESERVE and SHN_HIRESERVE. Here "section index" may not be the index into section header table. > > Also, providing an example with st_shndx proves little, since I was making a > point about the sh_link section in section number zero. The ELF spec does not > say "add 256 to section indexes." It just says to use the section index. > > What does icc produce with the sample source code? There are 70005 section headers, starting at offset 0x484bdc: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al [ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 011175 00 0 0 0 [ 1] .strtab STRTAB 00000000 000034 194bef 00 0 0 1 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
