If it is agreed that gas should be generating R_SPARC_UA32, then should I go ahead and submit a bug for this issue?
Thanks, Andrew On 8/15/05, Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Silly question, perhaps, but why not have gas generate R_SPARC_UA32? > > That indeed appears to be the most appropriate solution and would match what > GCC emits for its own DWARF-2 debug info (i.e. .uaword instead of .word > directives). Perhaps Jakub can give some insights. > > -- > Eric Botcazou > > _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
