On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 8:18 PM Robert Elz <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: > > (line joining using \ isn't technically an escape sequence, but that > detail is irrelevant here). >
bash(1) claims it to be: There are three quoting mechanisms: the escape character, single quotes, and double quotes. A non-quoted backslash (\) is the escape character. It preserves the literal value of the next character that follows, with the exception of <newline>. If a \<newline> pair appears, and the backslash is not itself quoted, the \<newline> is treated as a line continuation (that is, it is removed from the input stream and effectively ignored). > POSIX says: > > It is unspecified whether the line containing the trailing delimiter > is itself subject to this line continuation. > > which means that nothing is required to make that work. Further, unless > bash documents it as working, it is free to change the way it works for > that at any time, so was anyone to take your advice and actually use that > method, then they'd be risking their code breaking in a subsequent release, > with perhaps no warning at all. > > kre > I do not see any exceptional circumstances in the above description of line continuation in bash(1), which implies there are none, which implies it is stating "it as working", without exception. Perhaps the documentation should be updated to reflect the fact that it may not honor exceptional circumstances.