On 1/5/25 5:13 AM, Oğuz wrote:

Maybe. I'm not sure if propagating shell options to child shells was the
intended primary use.

It was a long time ago (1995), but yes, that was one of the primary use
cases.

With ENV/BASH_ENV you can already do that and more, I
don't see the point in adding an environment variable that does the same
thing.

You can exactly duplicate the current set of options in a child shell
without having to mess around with startup files. I agree that cygwin
probably should have used BASH_ENV for their intended use.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    c...@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to