there is still code fault $n is supposed to be 'assoc' im sorry bye
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, 23:44 #!microsuxx <fxmb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry code cleaned up : it was more and stuff
>
> c() {
> eval -- "$@"
> l
> }
>
> l() {
> r [[ -v $n ]]
> r "(( \${#$n[@]} ))"
> }
>
> r() {
> eval "$@" &&
> echo -e "$@\t\t$r"
> }
>
> c unset -v assoc
> c declare -A assoc
> c 'assoc+=( foo bar )'
> c 'assoc+=( 2foo 2bar )'
> c unset -v assoc
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, 23:36 #!microsuxx <fxmb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024, 21:10 Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/6/24 9:38 PM, David Linden wrote:
>>>
>>> > Bash Version: 4.4
>>> > Patch Level: 20
>>> > Release Status: release
>>> >
>>> > Description:
>>> > This errors in 4.4, did not in 4.2: set -u; declare -A foo; echo
>>> ${#foo[@]}
>>>
>>> Yes, this was a bug in bash-4.2, fixed in bash-4.3. A variable isn't set
>>> until it's been assigned a value. This fix aligns the array variable
>>> behavior with the scalar (non-array) variable behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>> > How am I supposed to determine that a declared associative array
>>> is empty?
>>>
>>
>> to try to answer ' how to check if assoc arr is empty '
>> first [[ ${name@a} == *A* ]] or == A not sure
>>
>> then in code
>>
>> ~/m $ cat m.test.emptyassoc
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> c() {
>> local r=$@
>> eval -- "$r"
>> l
>> }
>>
>> l() {
>> l1
>> }
>>
>> r() {
>> eval "$@" &&
>> echo -e "$@\t\t$r"
>> }
>>
>> l1() {
>> r [[ -v $n ]]
>> r "(( \${#$n[@]} ))"
>> }
>>
>> unset -v assoc n
>> n=assoc
>>
>> c : init
>> c declare -A assoc
>> c 'assoc+=( foo bar )'
>> c 'assoc+=( 2foo 2bar )'
>> c unset -v $n
>>
>> ~/m $ bash m.test.emptyassoc
>> [[ -v assoc ]] assoc+=( foo bar )
>> (( ${#assoc[@]} )) assoc+=( foo bar )
>> [[ -v assoc ]] assoc+=( 2foo 2bar )
>> (( ${#assoc[@]} )) assoc+=( 2foo 2bar )
>>
>> therefore [[ -v and (( $# works
>>
>> That's not the question that `set -u' answers. It will tell you whether
>>> a variable with attributes (or without) has been assigned a value.
>>>
>>> Does your code manage this variable? If it does, you should be able to
>>> determine whether or not it was ever assigned a value, or make sure
>>> that it has been assigned a value, if that's important. The empty array
>>> is a valid value, just like the empty string is a valid value for scalar
>>> variables.
>>>
>>> > Or even use it in a conditional even one where the value won't
>>> be evaluated?
>>>
>>
>> what
>>
>> What do you mean? Using something like foo[@] is fine in expansions
>>> where it won't be expanded:
>>>
>>> echo ${foo[@]-unset}
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> v=set; echo ${v:-foo[@]}
>>>
>>> But if you get into a case where the variable needs to be expanded,
>>> you're going to get an error if the variable isn't set.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
>>> ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
>>> Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu
>>> http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
>>>
>>
