Oğuz: > > shynur: > > > > Oğuz: > > > > > > shynur: > > > > > > > > "bash-fc.Esf9by", which seldom benefits from editors > > > > that use *suffixes* to infer what syntax highlighting > > > > should be enabled. > > > > > > For example? > > > > When Emacs opens a file named "bash-fc.NNNNNN.bash", it'll > > enable sh-mode automatically > > Vim does that without the .bash extension. What stops Emacs > from doing the same?
Editors needn't give "bash-fc.NNNNNN" special handling, IMO. Because simply adding a ".bash" extension can take care of ALL editors, once and for ALL. You were just looking for a chance to show off from the start, weren't you? After all there's no need to say "for example?" at the very beginning, otherwise I won't post this FR. You win. Vim did a good job this time. Applause...
