s : BASH_SOURCE_REAL : BASH_SOURCE_ABSOLUTE On Thu, Jul 25, 2024, 15:10 Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
> On 7/18/24 4:44 PM, konsolebox wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 11:02 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote: > >> > >> On 7/11/24 3:51 AM, konsolebox wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:08 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> > wrote: > >>>> and the BASH_SOURCE > >>>> absolute pathname discussion has been bananas, so that's not going in > any > >>>> time soon. > >>> > >>> Maybe just create BASH_SOURCE_REAL instead to avoid the gripes. > >> > >> I don't think so. It's not very useful to have two variables that are so > >> similar -- it's needless overhead. > > > > So I guess it's really now just about BASH_SOURCE. What's the final > > decision on this? I don't think waiting for more input would make a > > difference. > > The best path forward is to enable the behavior with a new shell option, > initially disabled. > > -- > ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer > ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates > Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU c...@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/ > >
