i most dont understand your text story On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 3:03 PM Martin D Kealey <mar...@kurahaupo.gen.nz> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, 18:03 Grisha Levit, <grishale...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sounds like you want all the commands in the alias to be executed as a >> group -- so you can just write it as one: >> >> alias bad='{ echo fail; continue; }' >> > > That right there USED to work as a function: > > bad() { echo fail; continue; } > ah cont in func But then someone suggested allowing non-local break & continue was a bug, > and the few people who considered it couldn't think of even as simple an > example as that right there. > > So it was "fixed", and now that function doesn't work. It sickens me that > the work-around is to enable alias expansion in scripts. > > *Grumble* > -Martin > > PS: and people think I'm crazy for wanting to write new stuff in Perl, in > preference to Bash. Bash as a language has nothing else going for it, so if > after 28 years I still can't consider it stable, what is the point? > perl is simple and big .. i like old around y2k when i tried hack some perl together the public media , as many else , is every thing than perfect perl i didnt see fpr years , as many other tho big links about 28 years , u can see it as 1) specification or 2) version i just wanna say .. it still takes a while >