On Tue, Jan 25, 2022, 06:24 Robert Elz, <k...@munnari.oz.au> wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 05:45:23 +0800 > From: konsolebox <konsole...@gmail.com> > Message-ID: < > cajnmqwbvrbdijqcu8+oo0gvic7onew8nkv4djfyy3o5eepm...@mail.gmail.com> > > | As for me whatever it is, it should be done consistently and with no > | compromise. > > I have no idea why you decided to send this message to me (as well as the > list), my message was entirely about why one might want to export, and > import, PS1 into a shell, which your comments don't seem to have anything > to do with at all. >
Yes, sorry. I admit I only replied right away and didn't even read your conversation. It's meant to be a general reply to the thread. > But I also fail to see how: > > | Post filename expansion or population processes should not make any > | interpretation of the expanded filenames in whatsoever manner. > > is related to the original issue either, which was just about how > a (literally unchanged) pathname sent to a terminal might cause weird > effects (changing the font foreground to red would be nothing to be too > alarmed about, making it be black on black would be less amusing to most > people). > If the code is in no way interpreted by bash and literally just sent to the terminal then I guess it's not bash's problem and escaping it out would be a generous act. -- konsolebox
