On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, 9:09 AM Ilkka Virta <itvi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:46 PM Chet Ramey <chet.ra...@case.edu> wrote:
>
> > Bash reports the error it gets back from execve. In this case, it's
> > probably that the loader specified for the executable isn't present on
> your
> > system.
> >
>
> OTOH, for a script, Bash checks to see if the problem is with the
> interpreter and reports accordingly:
>
>  $ ./foo.sh
> bash: ./foo.sh: /bin/noexist: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
>
> The shell does go on to stat() the file after getting ENOENT from execve(),
> so I suppose it could
> add some clarifying note to the error message for the case of a binary file
> too.
>

The error is produced by the kernel. Bash merely passes it along.

>
  • Misleading... Andrea Monaco
    • Re: M... Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev
    • Re: M... Chet Ramey
      • R... Ilkka Virta
        • ... Dennis Williamson
        • ... Chet Ramey
          • ... Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev
            • ... Ángel
              • ... Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Eli Schwartz
                • ... Dmitry Goncharov via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell
                • ... Robert Elz
                • ... Chet Ramey
                • ... Robert Elz
                • ... Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev

Reply via email to