On 12/23/18 12:01 PM, Bize Ma wrote:
> Chet Ramey (<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>) wrote:
>
> >
> > While this works:
> >
> > var=(hello); echo "${var[ ~0]}"
> > hello
>
> Because negative array subscripts count backwards from the end of the
> array.
>
>
> Doh!, yes. And, because of that: "${var[-1]}"
> should give the *last* element of array "var", shouldn't it?
Yes, if it's an array variable.
> Consequently, this happens:
>
> $ unset var; var[0]=77; echo "${var[0]}"; echo "${var[-1]}"
> 77
> 77
>
> The only value in var is at index 0, which means it is also the *last* value.
Correct.
>
> The point being that a variable which has an scalar value "var=hello"
> should act (for most practical cases) as an array for which only the
> value at address 0 has been defined.
>
> Both command line above should have printed "hello".
No. 0 is the only valid subscript for a non-array variable. The difference
between bash and other shells that implement this feature is that bash
warns about negative subscripts.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU [email protected] http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
