Chet Ramey (<chet.ra...@case.edu>) wrote: > On 12/19/18 10:15 PM, Bize Ma wrote: >
> Ah, now we're moving the goalposts. No, that is not the intent. I merely failed to correctly convey the perception that others have of your code: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/487260/265604 And, having failed, I am trying again. But, probably, I should just not inform you of what others think given your upfront rejection to any (constructive) criticism. There's a case to be made for doing > that, I suppose, but I'd rather defer to the system's default handling > for a particular signal. > Do as you wish, we will still be able to form our own opinion about buggy code.
