According to Chet, the definition > is the same as the ISO C standard. I'm not sure if there's a public > version of the ISO C standard document, but > http://c0x.coding-guidelines.com/6.4.4.1.html seems to be good enough. > The definition of an "integer constant" in that document does not > include a sign. >
> That is a description of the inability (or unwillingness) to raise above c limitations. Let me state that even better. That's like saying that because the only tool known is a hammer, then, using an screw is not possible with a hammer and therefore it is a bad idea to invent one. Just silly. > I'll just use some other shell. > > -- Cases are always threesome: Best case, Worst case, and Just in case
