-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 5/25/15 8:15 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 25 May 2015 17:38, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 5/25/15 9:15 AM, isabella parakiss wrote:
>>> This is from configure.ac
>>>
>>> linux*) LOCAL_LDFLAGS=-rdynamic # allow dynamic loading
>>> case "`uname -r`" in
>>> 2.[[456789]]*|3*) AC_DEFINE(PGRP_PIPE) ;;
>>> esac ;;
>>>
>>> It doesn't check for linux 4.
>>
>> Two things:
>>
>> 1. Is anyone actually using 4.0 in a distribution?
>
> all the rolling release distros ? i've been running 4.0 pretty much sinc
e it
> came out.
Well, ok then. :-)
>> 2. If you're looking at bash-4.3, why would you have expected a version
>> from a couple of years ago to check for it?
>
> to be fair, that's what the code looks like in git too ...
It does. This is the first I heard that Linux 4 was released.
>> Between configure.ac and BASH_SYS_PGRP_SYNC, I imagine that it will be
>> covered when 4.0 makes it out to the world.
>
> can't we simply delete the uname check ? it's wrong when cross-compiling
and
> redundant with the other macro.
Yeah, that's probably a good idea. Having it enabled doesn't really hurt
anything, though, it's just a way to force synchronization that Linux
needs.
- --
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAlVk3QwACgkQu1hp8GTqdKuKFACfZB0F//xYy/mL/0KvyNKvRs7U
yAAAnRRmZT2tAWXELt0nBCLTDq65bjFM
=qjFF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
