On 09/01/2013 05:52 PM, Chris Down wrote:
On 2013-09-01 12:45, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
1) With both nullglob and failglob enabled it is considered an error for a
glob not to match anything. I'd say it's more natural to not produce an
error in this case. Otherwise a fairly useful behavior is broken, like
glob use in "for" loop:
Well... nullglob *and* failglob are pretty much at odds with each other. I'm
not sure what you expect to happen.
Ah, right, sorry, I didn't think this through.
Sincerely,
Nick