On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Bruce Dawson <brucedaw...@cygnus-software.com> wrote: > I'll give those a try. > > BTW, I just posted the blog post to share what I'd found. You can see it > here: > > http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/counting-to-ten-on-linux/ > > I hope it's accurate, and I do think it would be worth mentioning the issue > in the documentation for 'time' and the bash 'time' internal command. > For what it's worth, I still thinks that time is not lying (though the man page warns about possible inaccuracies), Your loop with expr might be "cpu bound" but it does not run often because other processes are given a chance to run.
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Pierre Gaston
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Bob Proulx
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Pierre Gaston
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Hans J. Albertsson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' William Park
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Chris Down
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Chris F.A. Johnson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' Dan Douglas
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)... Linda Walsh
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setings?)... Pierre Gaston
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel setin... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' (kernel s... Linda Walsh
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' (ker... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Linda Walsh
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Linda Walsh
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Linda Walsh
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Linda Walsh
- RE: Bug/limitation in 'time' ... Bruce Dawson