On 1/23/12 8:52 AM, Roger wrote:
> A little more indepth examination, and I can see VIM's wait is approximately
> double of what the readline patch's wait time is. However, I think the
> shorter
> wait time is more functional as when typing a double char, it in no way takes
> as long as VIM's wait time unless you type the same char with your finger and
> then use a toe to type the second char.
>
> Matter of fact, I'm starting to find VIM's long wait time length a little
> annoying. ;-)
>
> Great job at guessing the wait time!
Thanks. Half a second seemed right.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
