On 7/15/11 8:49 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Chet et al,
>
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> [concerning licensing]
>> Looking over bash 4.2, I have a few questions:
>
> After investigating a little more and testing with files removed, I'm
> down to one question (though it would still be nice to clarify the
> licenses of the other files mentioned): what is the intended license
> of the bash manpage at doc/bash.1, if any?
>
> The opening comments only say
>
> .\" MAN PAGE COMMENTS to
> .\"
> .\" Chet Ramey
> .\" Case Western Reserve University
> .\" c...@po.cwru.edu
> .\"
> .\" Last Change: Tue Dec 28 13:41:43 EST 2010
>
> I am interested in whether you are okay with users and distributors
> using, modifying, and distributing the file, and if so under what
> terms.
The man page copyright belongs to me -- I don't know that I ever
assigned it to the FSF. I don't have a problem with others modifying the
man page, and expect it under certain circumstances. For instance, if a
distribution modifies the startup files bash reads (e.g., to add
/etc/bash.bashrc as some have done), I expect them to modify the manual
page in the distribution to reflect that.
In other cases, I would prefer that any changes get sent back to me
so I can modify as necessary for future releases.
> Thanks for writing the manpage, by the way! It is generally a
> pleasant read and very clear.
Thanks. I'm glad you like it.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
