On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 04:30:40PM +0200, Rafaël Fourquet wrote:
> Do you mean, in your example, that e.g.
> ... do mapfile -t files <<< "$group" ; ls -1 "${files[@]}"; done ...
> is better than:
> ... do xargs -d '\n' ls -1 <<<"$group"; done ...
imadev:~$ group=$'foo\nbar\n"hi mom"\n'
imadev:~$ xargs -d '\n' printf '<%s> ' <<< "$group"
xargs: unknown option: -d
Must be some GNUism you're attempting to use (granted, the -0 was also
a GNUism, but it's at least one I've heard of -- and is also present
on most BSD boxes).
If my guess is correct, your -d option is supposed to turn off the
blatant historical stupidity and uselessness that characterize xargs:
imadev:~$ xargs printf '<%s> ' <<< "$group"
<foo> <bar> <hi mom> imadev:~$
Where'd the quotes go?? Oh, right, xargs eats them!
imadev:~$ group=$'foo\nbar\n"hi mom"three quotes"\n'
imadev:~$ xargs printf '<%s> ' <<< "$group"
xargs: missing quote?: quotes
So, apart from "xargs doesn't have a -d option" and "xargs without a -d
option can't handle filenames", sure, xargs is awesome! </sarcasm>
