Jan Schampera wrote: > I intentionally expected <() and >() to be as protected as $() is. Is > there a specific reason for them to not be protected against the > initial parsing?
Those sequences are not treated specially, but it's a reasonable
suggestion for a future enhancement.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
