Hi all, > Le 8 déc. 2018 à 00:48, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> a écrit : > > How does that sound? As far as I can see, this would solve the problems > (A), (B), (C) in the Bison support, while at the same time not regressing > behind 2.69 regarding the Yacc support.
It sounds excellent to me. While at it, I would be also very happy if we could get rid of ylwrap in the case of AC_PROG_BISON instead of AC_PROG_YACC.
