On Mon 20 Jun 2011 07:35, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> writes: > On 06/19/11 12:01, Andy Wingo wrote: >> No, this program also exhibits the same incorrect behavior, for purposes >> of stack growth checking. > > Thanks, I guess we'll have to turn it up a notch. How about the > following test program?
Works for me. It's very nasty though :-P Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
