Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> writes: > On 10/01/2010 03:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> Either way, the name of the indirect variable being assigned is >> $prefix_a_b, whether you use pre- or post-2.67. Why is 'a=b' being >> passed instead of 'a_b' in the first place? I'd need to see more >> context of the real macro usage (rather than this trivial test case) to >> see whether the efficiency hit is a corner case of a=b is likely in real >> life and thus a performance regression, or just an extreme that is not >> worth worrying about. > > Given it's about GCC options, I'd guess the real parameter was akin to > -Wformat=2 and it's building something like > ax_cv_gcc_option__Wformat_2.
Yes, the original bug report was for the behavior of: AX_CFLAGS_GCC_OPTION(-std=c99) See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593838 -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org