On 08/16/2010 12:11 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 08/15/10 21:26, David Fang wrote:
I'm desperate enough to use sed to patch config.status after it's been
generated:
If you're that desperate, you're desperate enough to use bash
instead of the broken Darwin shell, no?
To others:
Would it be appropriate to patch Autoconf to generate a 'configure'
that rejects that implementation of 'echo', if it discovers the bug?
Yes. Or that rejects that shell. I'd be wary of using a value of
$as_echo that goes against POSIX.
Paolo
