> Yes, that sounds reasonable, but OTOH, we had also a lot of complaints > that AUCTeX took over latex-mode. So for me, introducing new names was > also a chance to cut off with that old habit. But as I said in my other > message, I don't want to block a feature I don't use. If you and Keita > think we should do this, let's do it. >
I could just as well be persuaded that AUCTeX should never take over by default. Then, anyone updating AUCTeX to add something to their config (a couple lines saying where LaTeX-mode should activate). I guess that'd cause a lot of headache -- I know that I didn't read NEWS when updating for many years, and imagine the same is true for many users. My main suggestion is that the default behavior should be consistent between tex files and source blocks, so as not to cause surprises like in the original message in this thread. _______________________________________________ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
