Hi Tony,
Tony Zorman via bug-auctex via Bug reporting list for AUCTeX
<bug-auctex@gnu.org> writes:
> this is mostly a follow-up on [#61410], in which texmathp.el was made
> aware of verbatim constructs. The current check for this is
>
> (if (and (fboundp 'LaTeX-verbatim-p)
> (LaTeX-verbatim-p (cdr match)))
> …)
>
> The comment above that code snippet mentions texmathp running as
> standalone, but perhaps it was still intended to run in a TeX buffer.
> The actual check in LaTeX-verbatim-p is just to see whether
>
> (nth 3 (syntax-ppss))
>
> returns nil or not. However, Org mode seems to treat inline and display
> maths as a string, which causes texmathp to misbehave. (I know that Org
> has org--math-p as an around advice, but I disabled that for the
> purposes of this test.)
>
> Would it perhaps be possible to amend the above check to see whether the
> current major mode is a TeX-derived one?
I don't use Org so maybe I don't understand the above correctly, but
does this change meets your requirement?
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/texmathp.el b/texmathp.el
index 3316c461..ec553a3a 100644
--- a/texmathp.el
+++ b/texmathp.el
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ See the variable `texmathp-tex-commands' about which
commands are checked."
;; `LaTeX-verbatim-p'. We add a check here in case this library
;; is used stand-alone without latex.el provided by AUCTeX
;; (bug#61410):
- (if (and (fboundp 'LaTeX-verbatim-p)
+ (if (and (derived-mode-p 'TeX-mode)
+ (fboundp 'LaTeX-verbatim-p)
(LaTeX-verbatim-p (cdr match)))
(progn
(setq texmathp-why `(nil . ,(cdr match)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
