Looks good to me (I prefer it over my original suggestion). Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 8:52 AM Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> wrote:
> Hi Paul and Uwe,
>
> >>>>> Paul Nelson <ultr...@gmail.com> writes:
> > As for the "always-align t" case, there are still some natural "broken"
> > examples, as you know:
> > #+begin_src latex
> > \begin{equation*}
> > g = \begin{pmatrix}
> > a & b \\
> > c & d \\
> > \end{pmatrix},
> > \quad
> > h = \begin{pmatrix}
> > x & y \\
> > z & w \\
> > \end{pmatrix}.
> > \end{equation*}
> > #+end_src
> > #+begin_src latex
> > The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> > a & b \\
> > c & d
> > \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> > \begin{equation*}
> > a d - b c.
> > \end{equation*}
>
> > The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> > a & b \\
> > c & d
> > \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> > \begin{equation*}
> > a d - b c.
> > \end{equation*}
>
> > The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> > a & b \\
> > c & d
> > \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> > \begin{equation*}
> > a d - b c.
> > \end{equation*}
> > #+end_src
>
> I've been gradually inclined to the attached approach. Namely, align "&"
> as well as \end{foo} relative to beg-col, not beg-pos. In this way, the
> above examples turn into
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> \begin{equation*}
> g = \begin{pmatrix}
> a & b \\
> c & d \\
> \end{pmatrix},
> \quad
> h = \begin{pmatrix}
> x & y \\
> z & w \\
> \end{pmatrix}.
> \end{equation*}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> and
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> a & b \\
> c & d
> \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> \begin{equation*}
> a d - b c.
> \end{equation*}
>
> The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> a & b \\
> c & d
> \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> \begin{equation*}
> a d - b c.
> \end{equation*}
>
> The matrix $\begin{pmatrix}
> a & b \\
> c & d
> \end{pmatrix}$ has determinant
> \begin{equation*}
> a d - b c.
> \end{equation*}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This patch indents as
> \begin{equation}
> n u m=\left[\begin{array}{ll}
> 2 & 25
> \end{array}\right]
> \end{equation}
> , not the form Paul proposed
> \begin{equation}
> n u m=\left[\begin{array}{ll}
> 2 & 25
> \end{array}\right]
> \end{equation}
> . Maybe Uwe doesn't like the former indentation, but it is more similar
> to the behavior of other (non-tabular type) environments.
>
> > With a bit more massaging, it should be possible to avoid these. I had
> in
> > mind modifying LaTeX-indent-level-count (or the block surrounding where
> it
> > is called) in \end{TABULAR} cases, adjusting by the difference between
> the
> > matching \begin and its beginning of line.
>
> A similar idea crossed my brain, too. The best position to modify would be
> `LaTeX-indent-calculate-last'.
> It would make the indent algorithm more complex, so I began to search
> for more simple solution.
>
> Regards,
> Ikumi Keita
> #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
>
>
_______________________________________________
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
