Re: sparse vector 'without' returns ⍬ with sufficiently large vector

[Dr . Jürgen Sauermann]

Hi, thank you  all  for your clarifications. Fixed in SVN 1275. Jürgen On 4/30/20 11:47 PM, Rowan Cannaday wrote: Sorry for the late reply. I was out venturing for groceries, which has turned into a significantly more stressful task than anticipated it would. Thanks to responders who have provided simpler demonstrations of the effect. - Rowan On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 3:30 PM Kacper Gutowski <mwgam...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:17:20PM +0400, Ala'a Mohammad wrote: >I suspect It has something to do with Zero value. > >Kacper example also produce output when Zero is replaced with other >values. Zero isn't stricly needed to reproduce: (61⍴10) ~ 60⍴¯10 I didn't try to properly debug it, but the bug is in Bif_F12_WITHOUT::large_eval_AB which is used for A~B when 3600<(⍴A)×⍴B. -k