Ooops, missing something on my examples, correction: ( missing ⊂ on ⍳3 )
a ← 'abc'(⊂⍳3)99 the 3 examples are the same: 2(⍳0)3⊃a 2⍬3⊃a (2⍬3)⊃a On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 7:20 PM David Tran <email55...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure this is a bug or not, for me, (⍳0) ≡ ⍬, so it seems that both can > be replaced each other; consider below example: > > a←'abc'(⍳3)99 > > 2(⍳0)3⊃a ⍝ ≡ 3 > 2⍬3⊃a ⍝ ≡ 2 ⍬ 99 > (2⍬3)⊃a ⍝ ≡ 3 > > Doesn't the second example should return 3 as first example, without the > need parentheses as third example? > > (btw. my version is build from SVN around Oct ) > > > Thanks, > Dave > > > >