On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:08 PM Dr. Jürgen Sauermann <mail@jürgen-sauermann.de> wrote: > In that respect NARS is not ISO compliant, but nobody else is because ISO > contains a number > of failures which makes it impossible to be 100% compliant.
Thanks for expressing your opinion. That situation is very unfortunate, though. Is there any place where language experts could discuss their concerns and resolve any conflicting opinions? I'm aware that at least some authors of ISO standard are not among the living any more, so they can't explain their intentions. Also, if the standard body, i.e. committee is not functional any longer, then language effectively does not exist as a whole unless some other entity would come forward to establish a new standard interpretation. With best regards.
