Hi,

the Oxford Comma is definitely broken because 'and' is dyadic:

      1, 2, 3, ∧ 4
VALENCE ERROR
      1,2,3,∧4
            ^

      1, 2, 3 ∧ 4
1 2 12


/// Jürgen


On 04/26/2017 04:29 PM, enz...@gmx.com wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/americanvoices/oxford-comma-wins-court-case-workers-55578


On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:25:52 +0200
Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:

Hi,

this sentence is the verbatim copy of the phrase proposed in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
 (chapter 17) and I do not feel like criticising the GNU project for their spelling.

/// Jürgen


On 04/22/2017 12:28 AM, enz...@gmx.com wrote:


Thanks you guys doing this )help is really appreciated    - maybe I can make a contribution too

line 13        but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of             ; -> ,   for oxford comma?

references :

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/what-is-the-oxford-comma-and-why-do-people-care-so-much-about-it/

http://www.necn.com/news/new-england/Missing-Comma-Could-Cost-Maine-Company-Millions-416458593.html





On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 23:01:01 +0200
Alexey Veretennikov <alexey.veretenni...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Sure here it is. Don't expect anything big in it - it is just a couple
of lines of text.






Reply via email to