Hi again, one more thing. In the IBM documentation the functions are usually denoted in a form like this: Z←L+R using Z for the result and L and R for the left and right value arguments. The ISO standard (also mainly written by IBM uses: Z←A+B using Z for the result and A and B for the left and right value arguments. My personal preference used to be: R←A+B using R for the result and A and B for the left and right arguments. I guess this was from Gilman/Rose, but I am not sure. The GNU source code uses Z, A, and B as well as LO and RO for the left and right function arguments of operators. The info apl also uses A and B. I would therefore like to prose (objections welcome) to use the Z←A f B for functions and Z←A (LO op RO) B for e.g. dyadic operators. Best Regards, Jürgen Sauermann On 04/11/2017 08:20 PM, Juergen
Sauermann wrote:
Hi, |
- [Bug-apl] Free APL reference documentation, any takers... Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference documentation, a... Alexey Veretennikov
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference documentatio... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference document... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference docu... Alexey Veretennikov
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference... Louis Chrétien
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference... Louis Chrétien
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL refer... Louis de Forcrand
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL refer... Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL r... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL reference... Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL refer... Alexey Veretennikov
- Re: [Bug-apl] Free APL r... Juergen Sauermann