Juergen,
Just in case you missed this, buried in another thread:
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (+/X) ≡ ({⍺+⍵}/X)
0
FYI I get the following results on various APLs:
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X)(≡{⍺+⍵}/X) ⍝ GNU APL
2 3
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X)(≡{⍺+⍵}/X) ⍝ Dyalog APL
3 3
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X)(≡{⍺+⍵}/X) ⍝ NARS 2000
3 3
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X) ⍝ IBM APL2
3
Jay.
On 7 July 2016 at 11:39, Kacper Gutowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> In any case, the problem seems not to be related to inner product or to
> parsing of multiple operators at all. It manifests in any reduction of
> a deeply nested array with a primitive function. Lambdas work fine.
>
> Even when using single-element arrays, the result still has a wrong shape:
>
> X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X) ≡ (≡{⍺+⍵}/X)
> 0
> X←⊂¨,¨⍳3 ⋄ (⍴⊃+/X) ≡ (⍴⊃{⍺+⍵}/X)
> 0
>
> -k
>
