On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > is seems like IBM APL2 computes > 1 2 3 /¨ 4 5 6 > as: > (1 2 3/4) (1 2 3/5) (1 2 3/6) > However, the ISO standard says > Z ← A f¨ B (...)
The difference isn't in each operator, but in parsing / always as a monadic operator (albeit taking a numeric argument) rather than a dyadic function. I don't have APL2 to test, but I expect (1 2 3/)¨4 5 6 to work too. -k
