On 15 March 2016 at 22:47, Jay Foad <jay.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 March 2016 at 13:24, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 15 March 2016 at 21:14, Jay Foad <jay.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> 1 2 /¨ 3 4 ⍝ in APL2 this parses as (1 2 /)¨ 3 4 > >> 3 3 3 4 4 4 > > > > Are you saying that (1 2 /)¨ 3 4 is syntactically correct in APL2? > > Yes. / is an operator, so 1 2/ is a derived function, and you can > parenthesise any function-valued expression.
So is the SYNTAX ERROR from GNU APL here a bug then?
