Hi Mike, I probably did not get it back in September. To me it is not quite obvious why enclosing a nested scalar is different from enclosing a simple scalar. But since ISO and APL2 agree in this regard, I should follow suit. /// Jürgen On 03/03/2016 06:12 PM, Mike Duvos
wrote:
Hi Jürgen, I commented on this enclose issue back on the 14th of September. I actually liked the way GNU APL did it.https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-apl/2015-09/msg00061.html Regards, Mike |
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Jay Foad
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Jay Foad
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Kacper Gutowski
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Mike Duvos
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Mike Duvos
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Christian Robert
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Christian Robert
- Re: [Bug-apl] IOTA Ala'a Mohammad