Hi Mike,

I probably did not get it back in September. To me it is not
quite obvious why enclosing a nested scalar is different from
enclosing a simple scalar. But since ISO and APL2 agree in
this regard, I should follow suit.

/// Jürgen


On 03/03/2016 06:12 PM, Mike Duvos wrote:
Hi Jürgen,

I commented on this enclose issue back on the 14th of September.  I
actually liked the way GNU APL did it.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-apl/2015-09/msg00061.html

Regards,

Mike



Reply via email to