All right, I have re-run the Sieve benchmark on GNU APL as of svn id 669. I do see differences, but they are not great. I also ran it on a reduced case in order to have it finish quicker, so the breakdown could be incorrect. I will re-run this on the full (SIEVE 100000) test case and report back.
I can still see Clone taking ridiculous amounts of time though. Regards, Elias On 29 August 2015 at 11:42, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > I never analysed the Sieve benchmark. I'll take a look at it tonight. > > Regards, > Elias > On 29 Aug 2015 06:51, "Mike Duvos" <m...@wolf359.net> wrote: > >> Hi Fred, >> >> I just built SVN 664 on the Dell Dimension I did the original factorial >> benchmark on. The time went from 52 seconds to 23. So that is indeed a >> dramatic improvement. >> >> I wonder why my Prime Sieve didn't speed up much. >> >> Regards, >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Fred Weigel <fwei...@crisys.com> wrote: >> >>> Juergen >>> >>> I just built 664 -- the performance of the factorial 300 that Mike Duvos >>> posted has indeed improved enormously - now running 8 seconds instead of >>> 20 on my reference platform. >>> >>> In line with expectations from Elias' profiling results. >>> >>> Very well done! >>> >>> FredW >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
